Which do you think is a better game?

I think the space battles in 2 and the jedi add a nice touch as do the imrpoved graphics and formatting. Galactic conquest is somewhat long drawn however and can take hours to complete and can end up in several space battles in a row as you gather your forces to attack. The jedi are less than convincing and blocking is a major problem with them, and since when does anyone survive a lightsaber through their torso? One thing I was annoyed is that it is impossible to destroy a large ship, it just ends up in fighter battles instead of the actual main ship itself being destroyed. A good factor however is it is more fair, droidekas are no longer invincible, tanks are not as difficult to destroy along with AT ATs and AT TEs. The force powers can be delightful to take out large numbers of troops and the speed improved is better.

In battlefront 1 the maps are very good and much more fun to play in that the second version ie Kysseek docks, bespin platforms, tattoine the sea place. There are many other good maps that were removed from here however. The general fighting I find more enjoyable and realistic in this game but the almost indestrctable jedi annoys me. (seriously, I hit it with 7 vanguard missiles and dooks didnt die) The game is all round more enjoyable and I feel that for jedi and space battles, 2 is good, but if you want a good old blaster battle like the game should be, 1 is the best. And if u want space battles or jedi then play jedi knight or one of the many space fighter games for gamecube.

i say 1

i like some of the battle fields on 1
2 is better
i think that they sould make sb3 and u should be able to create your own charecter
like cloths, light saber color, hair type and color,skin color stuff like that
then that game would be better

I like 2 cause of the jedi, ive never had a star battle fight. The only problem is, is that i dont own the game. I have only played it at the matrix (gamin center).

I like galactic conquest taking a long time it is more fun that way.