http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_%28 ... trilogy%29


Go there, and many of our theroies may be proved wrong or right. Just read it, it's amazing from the detail. Read ALL of it please I'm so excited lol.....!!!!

wow thats really cool and my theory about the star rose might be right

BREAK THROUGH!! SWEETNESS!!!

Concerning the Quote of the Raven, Bladgen

* Interpreted to mean Eragon and Murtagh are indeed half-brothers

While two <Children> may share two <Parents>
And one <Child> of two <Parents> is certainly one
One <Mother> might be <Mother to> two <Children of different Fathers>.

So this may mean that Eragon's Mother, after leaving Morzan, had a relationship with Brom and Eragon is Brom's son.

Gotta love wikipedia. Hasent failed me yet lol...

ya but most of it was just hints and the rest was stuff we alrady knew

Awesome!!

it was bloody hints telling us that something is very likely to happen then giving a reason straight away why it might not!
that is the 1st time wikipedia has failed me..

hey HitNRunner, your theory is rong because in book 2 it sais that Eragon is the son of Morzan.
oh and eragonthestrong, wikipedia disapointed me a lot of time

Almost everyone here read Eldest!!! It is called a theory for a reason. We are wondering the distinct possibility of Morzan not being his father.

Man i read that like 5 times because it had so many new theories!! now i am even more confused about what will happen in the 3rd book now...!!

I hope some of the theories there are true.

yawn, guessed most of that already. by the way, Lord Infamous, isn't Zarroc meant to be red?

It proves some of our thoughts are right then. And the drawing is in pencil and shaded.

well this is the only picture i could find of it that fit into the avatar thing.. soo...

Lets get back on top-ic guys.

I dont think it told us anything valuble that we didnt already know, or guess.

I got some new stuff.

ya same here.. but i've been reading at the wikipedia website and i've learned a couple of new things.. and annibee found a link with a couple of theory's with good supporting facts to them

Yeah, I read that.

That's pretty cool. About how that theory of how you can have a certain magic color but still change it. Pretty good other facts too can't wait to read it/.

But Blagden went outside of Ellesmera, didn't he? But, that could prove useful.

That proves to be a pretty good theory. Well done. you should tell Wikipedia that, and they'll add it.

Nice. This could be in the next book. You should write a letter to CP about your theories/findings.

No, because she stayed in Carvahall for 5 months.

Good theories. You should write to CP.

I would but he probably doesn't read his own mail and other people have probably already realized this!!!

Do you ever go to Alageasia.com, he reads the mail from there. Somebody's talked about it once here but I don't remember who.

It's good to know, but at Alagaesia.com, has he read theories, or just plain fanmail???

all cool... but guns I dont know

You should at least try I have.

what are you talking about??? no one was talking about guns!!!

I'm talking about you sending some of your ideas to CP. I don't know what Tommi was talking about?

I thought Christopher Paolini had revealed that the third book is to be called Empire. And I have another theory: Saphira might die. That certainly would end the trilogy, but it would make me burst into tears, and I'm sure some of you would probably also feel that way. Murtagh's death does actually seem likely, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see!

I don't think Saphira will die. I think she is going to stay in Alageasia while Eragon sails off to the uncharted land.

Why would CP kill of Saphira!!! I would KILL HIM!!!

I hope you're not talking to me.

No, I'm talking about CP.

Good.

Don't spam plese. That and I don't know what would make someone think of it.

I think she stays behind while Eragon goes off.

NOOOOOOO!!! That's almost exactly like LOTR!!! Frodo goes and Sam stays behind!!! BUT IT'S MORE SAD!!!

My Dad Frodo should have died in the end. I think so too.

Your dad is named Frodo???? jj!

No I meant my Dad said Frodo should have died in the end.

So you think Eragon should die in the end???!!!

No Eragon is better. He was talking about the movie.

Oh, well, the ending will be the hardest part to predict.

Yeah really.

Yeah, you're right. I really hope Saphira doesn't die! She and Eragon should go to the uncharted lands together. I also agree with I'mNotCrazy...I'd KILL Christopher Paolini if he killed Saphira.

yes i feel the same way with you.. he wont kill saphira cuz then eragon wont live his long life.. but he might be like brom and still live long even tho his saphira was murdered right b4 his eyes by galbatorix.. but anyways he wont kill her

LOL. That is a really good theory, though! And so is the one in your signature about Arya, but I don't really think she really WILL be the other Rider. I think it will be somebody...unpredictable.

Yeah. I think it Might be somebody we haven't met yet. And he most likely will join Eragon's side so it won't be three against one.

Why a he??? Besides, all the evidence points towards Arya.

Still, all of the evidence points to ARYA!

HEY!!! YOU STOLE THIS:"NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Arguing has nothing to do with liking. At least for me. I hate arguing. " FROM ME!!! YOU CHANGED THE LOVE TO A HATE AND STOLE IT!!!

YOU TOLD ME TOO ON THE OTHER WEBSITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND SO I DO HATE ARGUING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No i didnt!!! this is what i said:

1. she has green magic, though not total proof, it is an indicator. 2. she is a great spell caster, making her need WAY less training 3. she's a great warrior.
4. it would solve Eragon's love problem, which from CP's point of view is probably a BIG reason.
2+3=5. she and Eragon would actually stand a chance against Galbatorix and Murtagh

This is my sig in SF. DON'T STEAL IT UNLESS YOU GIVE ME CREDIT!!!

This isn't all of this, but it's a start.

You said if you could put this in your sig at SF.

Where, show it to me. Proof is always best.

Ok I will.

1) Roran lead an entire village to Surda
2) He is a great warrior and with much training he will become even greater
3 Eragon wasn't any good when he first started, maybe if Roran trained he would be better
4) The two sword are for the two brothers one for Eragon which will be blue and one for Roran which will be green
5) Arya should stay with her people to help protect them and find out what she can do to help her people.
6) It'll be a family theme

I was talking about your sig.

1)That makes him no more desireable, Eragon didn't
2)He is an OK warrior and there isn't that much time
3)Time is of the essence
4)The swords don't have anything to do with this. the other one could as easily be meant for Arya
5)Arya has no reason to stay much longer. She can help them otherwise
6)Family theme is not a very good reason. Arya and Eragon getting together is a good reason

Ok. This came from You.

NO!!! Arguing has nothing to do with liking. At least for me. I like to argue. Same kinda thing as SF, but there is more stuff that has nothing to do with Eragon. And it's ALOT smaller! If you can, PUT THIS IN YOUR SF SIG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And I changed it up a little. I told you.

Whoa. Okay. Stop, please.

NO!!!! I said put this SITE in your SF sig!!!

What's a sight?

web site.. duhh

Ohh, well how am I going to do that?

Lets get on topic. (not trying to be a mod)

how could brom be his father if murtagh told eragon that morzan was his father in the ancient language

because murtagh believed that morzan was his father so he could say it in the ancient language but no meaning it was true cuz just he and galbatorix believed it..

how could brom be eragons father if murtagh said that morzan was his father in the ancient language

dude.. i just told you why in the post about.. you just said the same thing in your last post....

ive reminded what said angela about brom and the woman he loved and i came to belive that eragons father is brom not morzan

You can't lie in the ancient language. Right? Right. But if you think you're right, it's not lying. For example, say there are two boxes (red and blue). If the red box contains the marble, but I think that the blue one contains the marble, I can say "the blue box contains the marble" in the ancient language. But if I knew the marble was in the red box, I couldn't say that.

Which is why Eragon's story was written in the ancient language.

thats the most bloody likely theory but there is also the art of saying one thing an meaning anotherso just think about that

I can't think of another meaning.

OK, how is this anywhere near on topic???? We are talking about Brom being Eragon's father here!!!

WE are explaining the subtlties of the ancient language.

Murtagh thought that Eragon was his brother, so he was able to say it in the AL. END OF THAT DISCUSSION!!!

murtagh is eragons brother. he takes his INHERITANCE (zarroc)

He takes HIS inheritence!!! Eragon's "inheritence" is Brom's sword!!!

We know, but it might be talking about something else. Such as when Islazandi tells Eragon that Vrael's old quarters in Ellesmera were his inheritance.

Elvensurprise is right. There's the whole deal of saying one thing and meaning another that we haven't thought of.

What are you talking about?

how you can believe something and say its true in the ancient language but it really isnt.. or like brom said.. elfs can say one thing and mean another

Because you think you are saying the truth.

ya.. so its not really lying in the Ancient Language its just saying what you think is true..

Exactly. For more clarification, check Eldest.

Yeah it just depends on who it's coming froma dn how they say it I guess. Almost reminds me of the Solembum thing and about what he said about roots and stuff. More than one meaning...that's for sure. But yeah like you have stated elves can say one thing in particular and mean the complete opposite or something different than what we actually think they mean!

Exactly. When Eragon came to Surda, Arya asked how he was about them. He said Fine, but meant in his mean, the condition of his back. Also, you can say something in the AL, if you consider it true, even if someone else doesn't.

Sorry to be so picky, but it's elves, not elfs.

Don't spam, make comments with a purpose. You can believe something and say it in the ancient language, just to clear that up.

ya that was kind of interesting

i mean wikipedia i didn't see this conversation

He said it MIGHT be a bit supprising. But that maybe is still there. So if you weren't expecting it, it will be a suprise!